Ponad 4 miliony tytułów w języku angielskim i innych językach! Odkryj swoją nową historię już dziś!

Sprawdź status swojego zamówienia

Skontaktuj się z nami

License to Harass

Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech

Autor: Laura Beth Nielsen

Język:

Oprawa: Miękka

Wydawca: Princeton University Press

Dostępność: Dostępna u dostawcy

Wysyłamy za 14-21 dni

234.25 zł

Offensive street speech - racist and sexist remarks that can make its targets feel both psychologica...

Informacje o książce

Autor

Laura Beth Nielsen

Język

Angielski

Oprawa

Książka - Miękka

Data wydania

2006

strony

248

EAN

9780691126104

ISBN

0691126100

Enbook ID

04641125

Wydawca

Princeton University Press

Waga

360

Wymiary

157 x 233 x 13

Pełny opis

Offensive street speech - racist and sexist remarks that can make its targets feel both psychologically and physically threatened - is surprisingly common in our society. Many argue that this speech is so detestable that it should be banned under law. But is this an area covered by the First Amendment right to free speech? Or should it be banned? In this elegantly written book, Laura Beth Nielsen pursues the answers by probing the legal consciousness of ordinary citizens. Using a combination of field observations and in-depth, semistructured interviews, she surveys one hundred men and women, some of whom are routine targets of offensive speech, about how such speech affects their lives.Drawing on these interviews as well as an interdisciplinary body of scholarship, Nielsen argues that racist and sexist speech creates, reproduces, and reinforces existing systems of hierarchy in public places. The law works to normalize and justify offensive public interactions, she concludes, offering, in essence, a "license to harass." Nielsen relates the results of her interviews to statistical surveys that measure the impact of offensive speech on the public. Rather than arguing whether law is the appropriate remedy for offensive speech, she allows that the benefits to democracy, to community, and to society of allowing such speech may very well outweigh the burdens imposed. Nonetheless, these burdens, and the stories of the people who bear them, should not remain invisible and outside the debate.